The production cost has increased 27-fold, and success has become just as much more difficult to achieve.
The production cost of a Korean drama, which was around 360 million won per episode in 2015, has reached approximately 13 billion won per episode in the 2024 season of **'Squid Game'**. A 27-fold increase. However, spending 27 times more money does not guarantee 27 times more success. K-drama is now in the midst of this paradox.
A single figure encapsulates a decade of change: from 360 million won per episode to 13 billion won. As streaming capital poured in, the production cost of Korean dramas surged at an unimaginable rate. It proves that the world has opened its wallets to K‑dramas, yet it also marks the beginning of a precarious fissure.
As production costs rise, so does the cost of failure. The formula that once worked for dramas costing 170 million won per episode offers no guarantee when the budget jumps to 13 billion won per episode. As the scale grows, a single failure becomes increasingly difficult to absorb—that is the reality of K‑dramas today.
At the center of the skyrocketing costs are people. Verified top directors and writers are now demanding treatment on par with **Hollywood**, and the episode-by-episode appearance fees for leading actors who have achieved success on streaming platforms have jumped several times over. As global platforms compete to secure the best talent, unit prices have exceeded market principles.
Here, visual effects, overseas locations, and massive sets are added. Under the premise that “Netflix is producing it,” the production scale kept increasing, and once the bar was raised, it rarely came down. The inertia of costs has thus reshaped the entire industry's cost structure.
The core problem is that the link between cost and performance has been broken. More and more recent high‑budget releases are failing to replicate the success of early hits like “Squid Game” or “The Glory.” Costs are definitely rising, but performance is becoming increasingly uncertain.
Notoriety does not proportionally correspond to the budget. This is because what captivates viewers is not the scale of production costs, but the density of the story. However, the industry has been moving inertiaally towards **bigger and more expensive** productions. Investments have become more refined, but returns have become akin to gambling.
There are aspects that cannot be explained solely by crisis narratives. Korean dramas still top the global viewership rankings. The series that started on tvN and became a worldwide hit, “The Queen of Tears,” surpassed 40 million views during its broadcast, and major IPs continue to operate in the global market today.
In other words, K‑dramas haven’t lost their competitiveness; rather, the threshold for success has risen. The fact that the power of storytelling still resonates paradoxically shows that the problem lies not in the content but in the cost structure.
The era of competing on production costs has reached its limits. The subcontracting model that scales up by relying on external capital has exposed a ceiling to growth. In the next phase, the decisive factor will shift from “how big we can make it” to “how we can recover it sustainably.”
The key is the unit economy. If a drama cannot design a structure to recover costs and generate profits through production, distribution, and IP utilization, its flashy exterior will not last long. The next chapter of K-dramas will be written in the **redesign of profits**, not in a competition of scale.